Tags: Avoir Beau EssayerDissertation Fellowships HumanitiesFdr New Deal ThesisNathalie Dessay BastilleEssay On Status Of WomenStanford Creative Writing Certificate ProgramResidential Cleaning Business PlanWhat Is Medicare Assignment
Since the 1999 release of the film “Fight Club,” millions of people have resonated with Brad Pitt’s Tyler Durden and Edward Norton’s unnamed “everyman” character.The film prompted not only raving reviews from media analysts but also...
What concerns me are celebrities on magazine, television with 500 channels, some guy’s name on my underwear” (Fight Club).
This suggests that people are more concerned with how people view their material items than the actual purpose of them.
The second area for cultural analysis is the formation of true “masculinity.” As both cultures define true “masculinity” over and against the diminished masculinity in broader American society, both cultures propose that men need to overcome several hindrances to true masculinity common in American society today.
Thus both the film “Fight Club” and the evangelical right offer not only a critique of the shortcomings of masculinity in broader American culture but also provide a paradigm for overcoming such shortcomings.
The following study will explore two aspects of masculinity as found in both cultures.
First, this paper will compare the definition of “masculinity” as a cultural symbol in relation to other common cultural symbols.Among them, both cultures identify the failure of fathers, the self-definition according to occupation, and consumerism as the cultural chains restricting the development of true “masculinity” for the modern American man.Both cultures, therefore, present the need to overcome these restrictions before true masculinity may manifest.One unexpected sector of American society that has identified with the film, however, has been the religious right.Various evangelical men’s ministries across the country have adopted the name “Fight Club,” drawing images and slogans from the film (e.g., the image of “soap,” and the slogan: “the first rule of [Christian] fight club is…”) and occasionally even initiating faith based mixed martial arts competitions.Both cultures present the struggle to overcome these cultural constraints as a battle to conquer the self.Finally, both cultures conclude with the assertion that the cause of true masculinity is best served when liberated men become a part of something larger than themselves.Fight Club specifically debunks the male American dream.It challenges’ the idea that the masculine identity is defined by We are by products of a lifestyle obsession…With religious adoption of a blatantly anti-religious paradigm, however, questions of the power and effect of metaphor arise.This paper seeks to explore the implications of the Christian appropriation of metaphor and the ways in which the adopted metaphor inadvertently/implicitly influences the users and recipients of the metaphor.