The purpose for writing a critique is to evaluate somebody's work (a book, an essay, a movie, a painting...) in order to increase the reader's understanding of it.Tags: To Do My HomeworkHow To Write A Compare And Contrast Essay For CollegeBachelor DissertationRead Write Think Research PaperBinghamton EssayAtticus Essay ConclusionEssay Purpose Higher EducationEssay About Immigration In The United States
In addition, this thesis is both supportable Critical essays are written across many academic disciplines and can have wide-ranging textual subjects: films, novels, poetry, video games, visual art, and more.
However, despite their diverse subject matter, all critical essays share the following characteristics.
The information and knowledge in the text needs to be evaluated, and the criteria that should be used can vary depending on your discipline.
This means that management, sociology, information technology, or literature may use different criteria.
However, in the context of a critical essay, the word "critical" simply means discerning and analytical.
Critical essays analyze and evaluate the meaning and significance of a text, rather than making a judgment about its content or quality.
*The arguments (answers with reasons) that it makes.*The structure of the text or the method used to answer the question.*The evidence used to support answers.*The conclusions reached in the text.*Any further questions raised, but not answered in the text. Read the text again and note the important points in detail such as the subject, question, arguments and/or evidence, and conclusions made, and your evaluation using your criteria.4.
These points should be summative and text-based, not judgemental unless combined with the critique. Read related texts, note differences or similarities and explain these.5.
An evaluation of the text using criteria appropriate to your discipline. *Does the text give new answers or interpretations to an old question? *An explanation of how the critical review will be organised. Leadership is different from management and this article provides a clear, cogent explanation of the difference.(From Coyle 2000)1. Kotter’s insights, tools, and ideas for action are relevant but the need for more insight is great.
When evaluating the text you could answer some of the following questions:*Is the question the text tries to answer relevant, interesting, new, useful? Summary / description of original (may be integrated or separate). Kotter examines the difference between leadership and management across three major sets of tasks: setting direction versus planning and budgeting; aligning people versus organisation and staffing; and motivating versus controlling and problem solving.(Adapted from Coyle 2000)2. [You should explain why in more detail](From Coyle 2000)You may not always feel you are able to judge whether the argument in a text is correct or not.